Project information
The project is carried out in groups of 3 to 4 students.
Instructions
The instructions are available here Download here. The training data set is available here Download here. The test dataset is available here Download here. Make sure that your submitted predictions are in the right format! Instructions on how to submit the predictions are found in the project instructions.
Peer Review
Important: Read the whole instructions for the peer-review before you start adding comments.
The peer-review is done individually and is anonymous. The review is done by filling out grades in the rubric (SV bedömningsmatris) of the project and by adding text comments. For text comments that belong to a certain question in the project report, use the text box of the corresponding criteria in the rubric. For general comments on the report, you can also in addition use the general text box. For the requirements to pass the peer-review please refer to section 7 in the instructions (see above).
You find your peer-review assignment in the right menu on the page project report. If you have trouble finding the assigned peer-review, try the steps suggested here Links to an external site.. When you have found your peer-review assignment, click the Show Rubric link in the upper right corner to show the rubric. You enter the grades by clicking on one of the boxes for each criterion and use the box to the right to enter a comment for that criteria. If you have trouble finding the rubric for the peer-review assignment, see the instructions here. Links to an external site.
Additionally, the following issues have been identified regarding the peer-review system in Studium using rubrics:
- If you have partially filled in the rubric, pressing the button "Save" will actually submit the review.
- If you have filled part of the Rubric, after pressing the button "Save", it is no longer possible to edit the Rubric grades. (see the final post here: https://community.canvaslms.com/thread/20738-can-a-student-redo-a-peer-review (Links to an external site.) )
- The only way to fix problem 2, is for the teachers to delete the review and assign it again.
Given the current limitations of the peer-review systems, please write your review elsewhere and wait until the end to fill in the rubric with its comments and grades, and fill it in a single attempt.
Important dates
The group registration and the submission of all required files are done here in studium.
The deadlines and other important dates for the project are as follows:
| Moment | Deadline | For whom |
Comment |
| Group registration | Jan 23 17.00 | Students | Late registrations are not accepted |
| First report submission* | Feb 21 | Students | Submit your report here. |
| Peer-review (of another group's report) assignment | Feb 22 | Teachers | |
| Peer-review submission | Feb 27 | Students | |
| Second report submission | March 5 | Students | Both revised report based on peer-reviews, contribution statement and predictions on test data |
| Feedback and grade (pass/revise) | 21/3 | Teachers | Both report and peer-review report as well as results of model test predictions. |
| Revised peer-review submission | 2/4 | Students | Only if revision on peer-review is required |
| Final revised report submission | 2/4 | Students | Only if revision on the project report is required |
| Feedback on the revised report | tba | Teachers |
All submission deadlines except group sign-up are one minute before midnight, i.e., 23.59.
Questions
If you have questions, write in the discussion forum or visit the help desk (see information below).
Help desk
See this page.