Peer-review of mini-project

The peer-review is done individually and is anonymous. The review is done by filling out grades in the rubric (SV bedömningsmatris) of the mini-project and by adding text comments. For text comments that belong to a certain question in the mini-project report, use the text box of the corresponding criteria in the rubric. For general comments on the report, you can also in addition use the general text box. There is no limit for the number of comments you can enter, but a guideline is 1/4–1/2 page in plain text for all your comments in all textboxes combined.

You find your peer-review assignment in the right menu on the page mini-project report.  If you have trouble finding the assigned peer-review, try the steps suggested here. When you have found your peer-review assignment, click the Show Rubric link in the upper right corner to show the rubric. You enter the grades by clicking on one of the boxes for each criterion and use the box to the right to enter a comment for that criteria. If you have trouble finding the rubric for the peer-review assignment, see the instructions here.

Additionally, the following issues have been identified regarding the peer-review system in Studium using rubrics:

1. If you have partially filled in the rubric, pressing the button "Save" will actually submit the review.
2. If you have filled part of the Rubric, after pressing the button "Save", it is no longer possible to edit the Rubric grades. (see the final post here: https://community.canvaslms.com/thread/20738-can-a-student-redo-a-peer-review (Links to an external site.) )
3. The only way to fix problem 2, is for the teachers to delete the review and assign it again.

Given the current limitations of the peer-review systems, please write your review elsewhere and wait until the end to fill in the rubric with its comments and grades, and fill it in a single attempt.

For the first criteria "Subset of methods" it will be difficult as a peer-reviewer to know the number of group members. If for example three methods are considered, you can grade it complete with the additional comment "given there are three group members" or something similar.