Mini-project report

  • Due 4 Mar 2022 by 23:59
  • Points 2
  • Submitting a file upload
  • File types pdf

Instructions

Upload your report for the mini-project here before the deadline. The report must be in pdf format. Other formats can not be uploaded. You can find the instructions for the mini-project here.

1646434799 03/04/2022 11:59pm

Rubric

Find rubric
Keep in mind that 920 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Evaluation metric for mini-project report
Evaluation metric for mini-project report
Criteria Ratings Pts
Edit criterion description
Subset of methods
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
1 Pts
Complete, well done!
The subset of methods chosen to explore is sufficiently large (methods from at least as many ‘families’ as there is group members)
Edit rating Delete rating
0 Pts
Incomplete, revision required
Not enough methods explored
pts
1 pts
--
Additional comments
Edit criterion description
Tasks (a)-(c) in Section 2.2
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
5 Pts
Complete, well done!
All tasks (a)-(c) in Section 4.2 are made for each method.
Edit rating Delete rating
0 Pts
Incomplete, revision required
For at least one method at least one of the tasks (a)-(c) in Section 4.2 is not made.
pts
5 pts
--
Additional comments
Edit criterion description
Description of the considered methods
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
5 Pts
Complete, well done!
The considered methods are described correctly and in an understandable manner.
Edit rating Delete rating
0 Pts
Incomplete, revision required
The considered methods are not described correctly and/or the description is difficult to follow.
pts
5 pts
--
Additional comments
Edit criterion description
Technical quality of the proposed solution
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
5 Pts
Complete, well done!
The considered methods have been used in a relevant way to address the problem and there are no flaws in the reasoning and motivations used.
Edit rating Delete rating
0 Pts
Incomplete, revision required
The considered methods have not been used in a relevant way to address the problem and/or there are flaws in the reasoning and/or motivations used.
pts
5 pts
--
Additional comments
Edit criterion description
Requirements in Section 4.1
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
5 Pts
Complete, well done!
The report includes everything required from Section 6.1.
Edit rating Delete rating
0 Pts
Incomplete, revision required
The report does not include everything required from Section 6.1
pts
5 pts
--
Additional comments
Edit criterion description
Feature importance task
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
5 Pts
Complete, well done!
The feature importance is discussed seriously.
Edit rating Delete rating
0 Pts
Incomplete, revision required
The feature importance is not discussed seriously.
pts
5 pts
--
Additional comments
Edit criterion description
Data analysis task
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
5 Pts
Complete, well done!
The data analysis is implemented correctly and the assigned questions are discussed seriously.
Edit rating Delete rating
0 Pts
Incomplete, revision required
The data analysis is not discussed seriously.
pts
5 pts
--
Additional comments
Edit criterion description
Language
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
5 Pts
Excellent language quality
The text is well written and easy to follow. No or very few grammar and spelling mistakes.
Edit rating Delete rating
3 Pts
Satisfactory language quality
The text includes some spelling and/or grammar mistakes but the readability is not affected in a major way.
Edit rating Delete rating
0 Pts
Unsatisfactory language quality, revision required
The text is difficult to read and follow because of poor language.
pts
5 pts
--
Additional comments
Edit criterion description
Format
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
5 Pts
OK
The report follows the format requirements (correct template, page limitation, etc).
Edit rating Delete rating
0 Pts
Not OK, revision required
The report does not follow the format requirements (correct template, page limitation, etc).
pts
5 pts
--
Additional comments
Total points: 41 out of 41