Rubric

Find Rubric
Keep in mind that 511 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Evaluation metric for mini-project report
Evaluation metric for mini-project report
Criteria Ratings
Q1 - Modelling
Complete, well done!
Model correct with clear notation
Complete, but could be improved
Model correct with somewhat unclear notation or minor typo
Incomplete, revision required
Model not correct
Q2 - Conditional independence
Complete, well done!
The conditional independence statement is correctly motivated with clear notation.
Complete, but could be improved
The conditional independence statement is correctly motivated but with somewhat unclear notation.
Incomplete, revision required
The conditional independence statement is incorrectly motivated
Q3 - Computing with the model
Complete, well done!
All three distributions correct with clear notation
Complete, but could be improved
All three distributions correct but with somewhat unclear notation
Incomplete, revision required
One or more of the three distributions incorrect
Q4 - Bayesian Network
Complete, well done!
The network correct and independent statement not verified
Complete, but could be improved
The network correct but with somewhat unclear notation
Incomplete, revision required
The network incorrect and/or no independent statement not verified
Q5 - A first Gibbs sampler
Complete, well done!
The implementation seems to be correct and the text and figures in the report are easy to follow.
Complete, but could be improved
The implementation seems to be correct, but the text and/or figures in the report are somewhat unclear.
Incomplete, revision required
The implementation is not correct and/or the text and the figures are very difficult to follow.
Q6 - Assumed Density Filtering
Complete, well done!
The implementation seems to be correct and the text and figures in the report are easy to follow.
Complete, but could be improved
The implementation seems to be correct, but the text and/or figures in the report are somewhat unclear.
Incomplete, revision required
The implementation is not correct and/or the text and the figures are very difficult to follow.
Q7 - Using the model for predictions
Complete, well done!
The implementation seems to be correct and the text in the report is easy to follow.
Complete, but could be improved
The implementation seems to be correct, but the text in the report is somewhat unclear.
Incomplete, revision required
The implementation is not correct and/or the result unreasonable.
Q8 - Factor graph
Complete, well done!
The factor graph with the corresponding messages are correct with clear notation.
Complete, but could be improved
The factor graph with the corresponding messages are correct but with somewhat unclear notation.
Incomplete, revision required
The factor graph and/or one or more messages are not correct.
Q9 - A message-passing algorithm
Complete, well done!
The implementation seems to be correct and the text and figures in the report are easy to follow.
Complete, but could be improved
The implementation seems to be correct, but the text and/or figures in the report are somewhat unclear.
Incomplete, revision required
The implementation is not correct and/or the text and the figures are very difficult to follow.
Q10 - Your own data
Complete, well done!
The method has been applied to a different dataset and the result have been reported in a clear and understandable manner.
Complete, but could be improved
The method has been applied to a different dataset but the clarity in the presentation of the result could be improved.
Incomplete, revision required
The method has not been applied to a different dataset or the presentation of the results are very unclear.
Q11 - Open-ended project extension
Complete, well done!
A major extension is presented and implemented with a clear motivation of why it could lead to an improvement.
Complete, but could be improved
A minor extension is presented and it is motivated why it could lead to an improvement.
Incomplete, revision required
No extension suggested or the motivation of why this could lead to an improvement is very unclear.
Disposition
Complete, well done!
The report is coherent with a logical structure including a proper introduction to the problem, very well motivated solutions and conclusions. The report can be perfectly read without support of the project instructions.
Complete, but could be improved
The report is coherent with an introduction to the problem, motivated solutions and conclusions. The report can be read without support of the project instructions with a few exceptions.
Incomplete, revision required
The report is not a proper report, including only the solutions to the problems and can not be read without the support of the project instructions.
Language
Excellent language quality
The text is well written and easy to follow . No or very few grammar and spelling mistakes.
Satisfactory language quality
The text includes some spelling and/or grammar mistakes but not to the degree that in a major way affects the readability.
Unsatisfactory langnuage quality, revision required
The text is difficult to read and follow because of poor language. The language needs to be revised and the report resubmitted.
Format
OK
The report follows the format requirements (correct template, page limitation, etc).
Not OK, revision required
The report does not follow the format requirements (correct template, page limitation, etc).