Rubric

Find rubric
Keep in mind that 718 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Evaluation metric for project report
Evaluation metric for project report
Criteria Ratings Pts
Subset of methods
threshold: pts
1 Pts
Complete, well done!
The subset of methods chosen to explore is sufficiently large (methods from at least as many ‘families’ as there is group members)
0 Pts
Incomplete, revision required
Not enough methods explored
pts
1 pts
--
Tasks (a)-(c) in Section 2.2
threshold: pts
5 Pts
Complete, well done!
All tasks (a)-(c) in Section 4.2 are made for each method.
0 Pts
Incomplete, revision required
For at least one method at least one of the tasks (a)-(c) in Section 4.2 is not made.
pts
5 pts
--
Description of the considered methods
threshold: pts
5 Pts
Complete, well done!
The considered methods are described correctly and in an understandable manner.
0 Pts
Incomplete, revision required
The considered methods are not described correctly and/or the description is difficult to follow.
pts
5 pts
--
Technical quality of the proposed solution
threshold: pts
5 Pts
Complete, well done!
The considered methods have been used in a relevant way to address the problem and there are no flaws in the reasoning and motivations used.
0 Pts
Incomplete, revision required
The considered methods have not been used in a relevant way to address the problem and/or there are flaws in the reasoning and/or motivations used.
pts
5 pts
--
Requirements in Section 4.1
threshold: pts
5 Pts
Complete, well done!
The report includes everything required from Section 6.1.
0 Pts
Incomplete, revision required
The report does not include everything required from Section 6.1
pts
5 pts
--
Feature importance task
threshold: pts
5 Pts
Complete, well done!
The feature importance is discussed seriously.
0 Pts
Incomplete, revision required
The feature importance is not discussed seriously.
pts
5 pts
--
Data analysis task
threshold: pts
5 Pts
Complete, well done!
The data analysis is implemented correctly and the assigned questions are discussed seriously.
0 Pts
Incomplete, revision required
The data analysis is not discussed seriously.
pts
5 pts
--
Language
threshold: pts
5 Pts
Excellent language quality
The text is well written and easy to follow. No or very few grammar and spelling mistakes.
3 Pts
Satisfactory language quality
The text includes some spelling and/or grammar mistakes but the readability is not affected in a major way.
0 Pts
Unsatisfactory language quality, revision required
The text is difficult to read and follow because of poor language.
pts
5 pts
--
Format
threshold: pts
5 Pts
OK
The report follows the format requirements (correct template, page limitation, etc).
0 Pts
Not OK, revision required
The report does not follow the format requirements (correct template, page limitation, etc).
pts
5 pts
--
Total points: 41 out of 41