Upload your report for the project here before the deadline. The report must be in pdf format. Other formats can not be uploaded. You can find the instructions for the project on the project page.
1to >0.0 Pts
Complete, well done!The subset of methods chosen to explore is sufficiently large (methods from at least as
many ‘families’ as there are group members)blank
5to >0.0 Pts
Complete, well done!All mandatory tasks [tasks (a)-(c)] in Section 4.2 are completed for each method._1336
0to >0 Pts
Incomplete, revision requiredFor at least one method, at least one of the mandatory tasks [tasks (a)-(c)] in Section 4.2 is not completed._9321
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of the considered methods952_3608
5to >0.0 Pts
Complete, well done!The considered methods are described correctly and in an understandable manner. The description captures the most important aspects of the methods in relation to the project objective.952_2409
0to >0 Pts
Incomplete, revision requiredThe considered methods are not described correctly and/or the description is difficult to follow, and/or the description does not capture the most important aspects of the methods in relation to the project objective.952_710
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeTechnical quality of the proposed solution952_4780
5to >0.0 Pts
Complete, well done!The considered methods have been used in a relevant way to address the problem and there are no flaws in the implementation, reasoning and motivations used. This applies to the main methods as well as methods for model tuning and model evaluation/comparison.952_1522
0to >0 Pts
Incomplete, revision requiredThe considered methods have not been used in a relevant way to address the problem and/or there are flaws in the implementation/reasoning/motivations used. This applies to the main methods and/or methods for model tuning and/or model evaluation/comparison.952_4674
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeRequirements in Section 5.1952_4305
5to >0.0 Pts
Complete, well done!All questions in the data analysis task in Section 3 is answered and implemented correctly, and the assigned questions are discussed seriously. The conclusions are supported by reasonable motivations, and the findings are supported with evidence (statistics, plots etc).2178_143
0to >0 Pts
Incomplete, revision requiredAt least one part of the data analysis task in Section 3 is missing, incorrect or not sufficiently motivated, and/or the data analysis task is not discussed seriously.2178_9080
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeLanguage2178_8139
5to >3.0 Pts
Excellent language qualityThe text is well written and well structured. It is easy to follow the text, and it contains no or very few grammar and spelling mistakes.2178_4162
3to >0.0 Pts
Satisfactory language qualityThe text includes some spelling and/or grammar mistakes but the readability is not affected in a major way.2178_6444
0to >0 Pts
Unsatisfactory language quality, revision requiredThe text is difficult to read and follow because of poor language.2178_6344
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeFormat2178_4112
Find rubric
